Held in the same position that had already caused breathing problems

A long-term patient died after breathing difficulties during restraint, months after the same position had caused the same problem.

NHS mental health · 2000s · Method: Prone

What happened

Geoffrey Hodgkins was 37 and a long-term mental health patient in the care of Portsmouth City Teaching Primary Care Trust. On 20 November 2004 he died after experiencing breathing difficulties during a period of restraint.

He had been restrained in the same position in the months before his death, and had suffered breathing problems then. The inquiry report sets out the sequence across the 19th and 20th of November. The trust reviewed its policies on observation, resuscitation, and restraint and rapid tranquilisation after his death.

The outcome

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Strategic Health Authority commissioned an independent inquiry under HSG94(97), reported in September 2006 as board paper HA06/037. It criticised the standard of care provided by the trust and recommended improvements in staff training for emergency situations. The trust prepared a strategic action plan, through which its board expected to be held accountable for corporate governance, clinical governance, management arrangements and patient and public involvement.

At the inquest, which concluded at the end of January 2008, the coroner recorded a narrative verdict criticising the failure to check vital signs and the delay in resuscitation, and renewed calls for national restraint guidance. His family told the inquest they had never been given a proper explanation of what happened.

What went wrong

The warning was already on file. He had been restrained in the same position months earlier and had breathing difficulties then, and the same thing happened again.

The inquest criticised two specific omissions on the day: vital signs were not checked, and resuscitation was delayed. The inquiry’s finding was broader, that the standard of care fell short and that staff were not trained for the emergency they faced. Nobody connected the earlier episode to the risk in front of them, and no policy required them to.

What it teaches

A previous restraint in the same position that caused breathing problems is a warning that has already been written down. The risk factor is repeated positional compromise, not the single event, and a care plan should treat the first episode as evidence.

That makes a restraint review a clinical task, not an incident report. The question after a first episode is not whether the hold was justified. It is what the patient’s breathing did, and what the service now knows that it did not know before.

Questions for the room

Evidence and limits

Confidence: confirmed, on sources of different weight. The inquiry’s criticism, the action plan and the review of trust policies come from the authority’s board paper HA06/037. The inquest findings rest on the vault record: the press file supplied with it contains nothing on Hodgkins, so the narrative verdict has not been read in a paper’s own words.

The inquest ended at the end of January 2008; the records give 30 or 31 January, or 1 February, so no exact date is stated here. No prosecution is recorded.

The record classifies the restraint as prone. The précis describes a position without naming it, so prone is the record’s label and not a word taken from the inquiry.

Sources

Our restraint reduction training shows teams how to read a restraint that has already gone wrong once as a live risk in the care plan.

Reviewed 20 October 2026.

All nhs mental health cases  ·  Restraint Casebook

Book in a 1-2-1 Meeting

Find Your Solution

What do you need? Use our simple tool to find the most relevant training and support options for your role, sector and challenges.