Hospital Violence Reduction – Internal Security Officers

Hospital Violence Reduction — Internal Security Officers

Staff in one hospital we worked in reported to us that they had variable success in securing assistance from Security Guards when incidents become critical. We ourselves experienced communication difficulties — mainly a language barrier — with Security Guards several times during our visit, which may contribute to this apparent lack of cooperation or coordination.

The Problem with External Security Contracts

In many contexts where the Security function is carried out by an external company, the contractual position of the guards precludes them from physically intervening in security-type situations. This situation, while common, is counter-productive to provision of a safe and secure facility.

Contractually barred from intervening — yet expected to keep the facility safe. This is the fundamental contradiction at the heart of outsourced hospital security.

We saw security guards enforcing rules and controlling access to certain areas while we observed the Emergency Department at that hospital. However, we also saw evidence of security staff engaged in distracting activities — arguably not central to their role, or which reduce their effectiveness.

Six Critical Differences from Nursing Staff

Externally-contracted Security staff may be differentiated from Nursing staff by several critical factors:

  • They are not as well-informed about the nature of illness and mental-health problems presenting at the ED
  • Their training in de-escalation and physical intervention may be limited to ‘standard’ but not ‘comprehensive’ levels
  • They are regularly cycled around to different parts of the hospital
  • They are sometimes not empowered to work on their own initiative but to wait for orders
  • They may be reactive to situations rather than pro-active
  • Their employment status is more tentative — low-skilled work, easily replaceable skills

Each of these factors alone would be a concern. Taken together, they paint a picture of a security function that is structurally disadvantaged — under-trained, under-informed, and under-empowered to handle the complex behavioural challenges that arise in a hospital Emergency Department.

The In-House Alternative

In some hospital environments, internally employed security officers are recruited, selected, screened, trained, inducted into, attached directly to, and gain experience in working for the Emergency Department. They work for and operate according to their direct contractual responsibilities with the hospital authorities.

They are a dedicated security function. Their experience is valued in their specialist role. And crucially, their loyalty and accountability run directly to the hospital — not to an external contractor whose priorities may not align with patient safety.

✅ Recommendation: Explore the in-house option to provide more effective functionality to security officers deployed within the hospital setting. Dedicated, trained, and empowered staff who know the department and its patients are a safer bet than contract guards who may be barred from intervening when it matters most.


Gerard O’Dea is a conflict management, personal safety, and physical interventions training consultant. He is the training director for Dynamis, a specialist provider of personal safety and violence management programmes, and the European Adviser for ‘Verbal Defense and Influence’, a global programme which addresses the spectrum of human conflict.

www.dynamis.training

Guides

Download our Positive Handling starter guide for schools.

Contact Us

Ready to explore Positive Handling training for your staff team? Let’s talk today.

Book in a 1-2-1 Meeting

Find Your Solution

What do you need? Use our simple tool to find the most relevant training and support options for your role, sector and challenges.